Blog Detail

Posted on 10 Sep,2025

Understanding Measurement Uncertainty in Testing Labs

Testing laboratories are trusted sources of information for industries, regulators, and the public. Whether it is determining the purity of medicines, assessing the safety of food and water or analyzing materials used in construction, the reliability of laboratory results directly impacts health, safety, and business decisions.

However, no measurement is ever perfect. Even when laboratories use the best equipment, trained professionals and standardized procedures, there will always be small variations that affect results. These variations may come from the instrument, the environment, or even the operator. The concept that captures this unavoidable doubt is called measurement uncertainty (MU).

Rather than being a weakness, measurement uncertainty is an important measure of confidence. It acknowledges that results are never absolute and helps customers, regulators, and laboratories themselves understand the reliability of the numbers reported.

What is Measurement Uncertainty?

Measurement uncertainty can be explained as the range of values within which the true result of a measurement is expected to lie. For example, if a laboratory reports the level of a chemical in drinking water as 12.0 mg/L ± 0.3 mg/L, it means the actual value could reasonably fall anywhere between 11.7 mg/L and 12.3 mg/L.

This does not mean the laboratory is unsure of its work. Instead, it demonstrates that the laboratory has carefully evaluated the possible factors affecting the measurement and is presenting the result in a transparent way.

In simple terms, measurement uncertainty answers the question:
“How sure are we of the measurement result, and what is the range of variation?”

Practical Example of Measurement Uncertainty in Testing

Consider a laboratory testing pesticide residues in vegetables. The legal maximum limit is 0.50 mg/kg.

·         The lab measures a sample and reports: 0.48 mg/kg ± 0.05 mg/kg.

Interpretation:

·         If we ignore uncertainty, the product appears safe (0.48 < 0.50).

·         If we include uncertainty, the true value could be as high as 0.53 mg/kg, which means the product may not comply with safety regulations.

This example shows how MU affects decisions that impact consumer safety and regulatory compliance.

Why Measurement Uncertainty Matters

For testing laboratories, MU is much more than a technical requirement. It plays a central role in:

1.      Building Confidence in declared Results
Clients and regulators need to trust that the results are not just random numbers but reliable information. By reporting uncertainty, the lab proves that it understands the limitations of its process and has quantified them.

2.      Regulatory Compliance
Standards such as ISO/IEC 17025:2017, which governs the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, require labs to evaluate and report measurement uncertainty where applicable. Without it, results may not be accepted by accreditation bodies or international partners.

3.      Supporting Critical Decisions
Many results are used to make “yes” or “no” decisions—such as whether a food sample is safe, whether water meets drinking standards, or whether a material passes strength requirements. If results are close to regulatory limits, knowing the uncertainty can make the difference between passing and failing.

4.      Enabling Comparisons Across Laboratories
Two labs may report slightly different results for the same sample. Without MU, these differences may appear contradictory. With MU, overlapping results can show that both labs are in agreement within their stated confidence ranges.

5.      Demonstrating Competence
Estimating and reporting MU reflects the professionalism of a laboratory. It reassures clients that the lab is not hiding weaknesses but is instead being open and scientific about the quality of its work.

Factors That Influence Measurement Uncertainty

Uncertainty arises from many sources in the testing process. Some of the most common include:

·         Instruments and Equipment – Every instrument has limits, such as resolution, stability, and calibration accuracy. Even high-quality equipment is never perfect.

·         Reference Standards – The quality and traceability of standards used for calibration can contribute to MU.

·         Environment – Temperature, humidity, vibration or electrical interference can affect measurements.

·         Sample Handling and Preparation – The way a sample is stored, mixed or processed can introduce variability.

·         Operators – Human factors, such as reading instruments or following procedures, can influence results.

·         Test Methods – Every method has its own precision limits and repeatability, which form part of MU.

Together, these factors shape the overall uncertainty of a test result. Recognizing them helps laboratories continuously improve their processes.

How Measurement Uncertainty is Estimated

While the statistical calculations behind MU can be complex, the overall process is straightforward in concept:

1.      Identify Sources of Variation
The laboratory first examines all the factors that could affect the result—equipment, environment, sample handling, and so on.

2.      Collect Data and Evidence
The lab uses information from calibration reports, method validation studies, quality control results, and inter-laboratory comparisons.

3.      Evaluate the Contributions
Each factor is considered in terms of how much it could influence the result.

4.      Combine and Express Uncertainty
The laboratory brings all the information together to provide an overall uncertainty figure, often expressed at a 95% confidence level.

The final result is reported in a simple form, such as:
“Result = 5.0 units ± 0.2 units (95% confidence level).”

For clients, this makes the result meaningful and easy to interpret without needing to understand the underlying mathematics.

Conclusion

Understanding measurement uncertainty is essential for testing laboratories. It is not about admitting doubt or weakness—it is about scientific honesty and credibility. By acknowledging that all measurements have limits, laboratories build trust, ensure compliance, and provide clients with results that can be confidently used for decision-making.

In today’s world, where laboratory results influence public health, safety, and trade, measurement uncertainty acts as a safeguard. It ensures that numbers are not seen as absolute truths but as carefully evaluated estimates with clear confidence levels.

For testing laboratories, embracing measurement uncertainty means:

·         More reliable and transparent results,

·         Stronger compliance with international standards, and

·         Greater trust from customers and regulators.

In short, measurement uncertainty transforms laboratory data into dependable, globally recognized information.